Jump to content

IPB


- - - - -

iPad 3 Has a 2048x1536 Retina Display


45 replies to this topic

#1 Dogismo

  • Moderators
  • 45,677 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPhone 3G
  • iPad:iPad 2

Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:30 AM

iPad 3 Has a 2048x1536 Retina Display



Over the past couple of months, several photos of displays claimed to be for the iPad 3 have surfaced from various sources. Such parts leaks are typical with the device's expected debut early next month. While reports have claimed that these displays are high-resolution "Retina" displays, there has been no definite confirmation of these claims so far.

Posted Image



MacRumors has now been able to obtain one of these iPad 3 displays and examine it under a microscope in an effort to determine whether it is indeed an ultra-high resolution Retina display. Physically, the purported iPad 3 display is the same size as the current iPad 1 and iPad 2 display at 9.7" in diagonal, and looks quite similar to the naked eye.

However, when comparing the iPad 3 display to one from an iPad 2 under a microscope, the difference in resolutions becomes readily apparent, with the iPad 3 display's pixels appearing to be one-quarter the size of those on the iPad 2.

Posted Image



Since we only had a raw iPad 3 display with no method to power it, taking high quality photos of the pixels was difficult. Still, even with the relatively poor lighting, you can easily make out the pixels on each display (made up of red, green and blue elements). We highlighted a cluster of 4 pixels (2x2) from the iPad 2 to compare it to the same area on the iPad 3. On the iPad 3, the same cluster was occupied by 16 pixels (4x4) -- exactly twice the resolution in each direction.

Extrapolating out, the iPad 3 screen should carry a full resolution of 2048x1536, exactly twice the linear resolution of the iPad 1 and iPad 2 which is 1024x768. Such a screen should be able to display much sharper images as compared to the previous generation iPads.

Apple is expected to introduce the iPad 3 with a media event on March 7, and the device is rumored to be carrying this high-resolution display, a new A6 system-on-a-chip, and LTE support for models with cellular data capabilities.

~MacRumors

Posted Image


#2 brutal truth

  • Moderators
  • 8,586 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 1G
  • iPad:iPad
  • iPod:iPod classic
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 18 February 2012 - 12:42 PM

If iPad 3 doesn't have better resolution whenever it comes out it will be a complete disappointment.

#3 iPhone

    Drop Dead Genius

  • Members
  • 52,889 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S, iPhone 3G
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 4G
  • iPad:iPad

Posted 18 February 2012 - 12:46 PM

quadcore, retina, 5/8 mp camera, bigger ram MUST be there >.>

#4 Towelie

    Sexy Avatar Group

  • Members
  • 13,438 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 2G

Posted 18 February 2012 - 03:09 PM

44GB of ram ::)
How long will they mourn me, bury me a mutha****in 'G' Bitch don't wanna die then don't **** with me
Posted Image

#5 Wolvy

    -iHackMyi Staff-

  • Members
  • 3,671 posts
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 4G, iPod touch 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:49 AM

Now they just need a reason for people to buy it.

#6 SayMilesAway

  • Members
  • 725 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S
  • Mac:MacBook Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 10:55 AM

View Postbrutal truth, on 18 February 2012 - 12:42 PM, said:

If iPad 3 doesn't have better resolution whenever it comes out it will be a complete disappointment.


Well said.

#7 Dogismo

  • Moderators
  • 45,677 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S, iPhone 4, iPhone 3G
  • iPad:iPad 2

Posted 19 February 2012 - 12:07 PM

Not planning on getting the iPad 3

Happy with my iPad 2

May change my mind later 😏

Posted Image


#8 Chris230291

    Thinking Different

  • Members
  • 11,895 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 5
  • iPad:iPad
  • Mac:MacBook Pro, Mac Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:01 PM

Quad core? I heard it was an A5.

#9 Chris

  • Moderators
  • 12,966 posts
  • iPad:iPad 3
  • Mac:MacBook Pro
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:27 PM

Def not going to be A5, unless it's an A5 clocked at higher speeds.

If it's got the retina display, 1GB of RAM, and an 8MP camera, I'm definitely upgrading.

#10 Chris230291

    Thinking Different

  • Members
  • 11,895 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 5
  • iPad:iPad
  • Mac:MacBook Pro, Mac Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:31 PM

That's just what it says on the rumour sites man. Everyone is changing their minds now and saying it will have a improved A5.
If you think about it though, where does the doubling stop? They cant just double spec's with each upgrade for ever.

#11 Chris

  • Moderators
  • 12,966 posts
  • iPad:iPad 3
  • Mac:MacBook Pro
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:38 PM

View PostChris230291, on 19 February 2012 - 07:31 PM, said:

That's just what it says on the rumour sites man. Everyone is changing their minds now and saying it will have a improved A5.
If you think about it though, where does the doubling stop? They cant just double spec's with each upgrade for ever.

View PostChannan, on 19 February 2012 - 07:27 PM, said:

Def not going to be A5, unless it's an A5 clocked at higher speeds.

If it's got the retina display, 1GB of RAM, and an 8MP camera, I'm definitely upgrading.

I've heard quad core and 2GHz dual core. Either way, I doubt Apple would call it A5. We'll see though.

#12 Chris230291

    Thinking Different

  • Members
  • 11,895 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 5
  • iPad:iPad
  • Mac:MacBook Pro, Mac Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:44 PM

I just saw this too. "A5X" apparently?

http://9to5mac.com/2...ssor-last-year/

#13 Chris

  • Moderators
  • 12,966 posts
  • iPad:iPad 3
  • Mac:MacBook Pro
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:47 PM

X is probably just a placeholder.

A5S anyone? Lol

#14 SayMilesAway

  • Members
  • 725 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S
  • Mac:MacBook Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:52 PM

i can def see it being quad core

#15 Chris

  • Moderators
  • 12,966 posts
  • iPad:iPad 3
  • Mac:MacBook Pro
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 07:53 PM

I can see it being either. As long as battery life stays the same and performance is boosted significantly, it doesn't matter if it's dual or quad.

#16 iPhone

    Drop Dead Genius

  • Members
  • 52,889 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 4S, iPhone 3G
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 4G
  • iPad:iPad

Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:07 PM

View PostChannan, on 19 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:

X is probably just a placeholder.

A5S anyone? Lol

lol

#17 Chris230291

    Thinking Different

  • Members
  • 11,895 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 5
  • iPad:iPad
  • Mac:MacBook Pro, Mac Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:08 PM

The only thing it could benefit from is a better screen or battery. Whats the point in adding all that power when it cant/doesn't use it?

#18 SoNyDiGiTaL

    Graphic Designer

  • Members
  • 3,423 posts
  • iPod touch:iPod touch 4G, iPod touch 2G
  • iPod:iPod classic

Posted 19 February 2012 - 08:16 PM

View Postbrutal truth, on 18 February 2012 - 12:42 PM, said:

If iPad 3 doesn't have better resolution whenever it comes out it will be a complete disappointment.


iPaid too much.

Posted Image



#19 Chris

  • Moderators
  • 12,966 posts
  • iPad:iPad 3
  • Mac:MacBook Pro
  • Apple TV:Apple TV 2G

Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:00 PM

View PostChris230291, on 19 February 2012 - 08:08 PM, said:

The only thing it could benefit from is a better screen or battery. Whats the point in adding all that power when it cant/doesn't use it?

Uh what are you talking about? It can always benefit from a better GPU. And a faster processor means pages load faster, apps install quicker, etc. It also opens up possibilities for new apps that require more powerful hardware.

#20 Chris230291

    Thinking Different

  • Members
  • 11,895 posts
  • iPhone:iPhone 5
  • iPad:iPad
  • Mac:MacBook Pro, Mac Pro

Posted 19 February 2012 - 09:05 PM

I mean, i think the OS needs a major overhaul before there's really any point in making more hardware improvements. If they wanted a little extra speed, they could just speed up the system animations, similar to what fackclockup does.